PLEASE NOTE: With major trade policy changes being announced, changed or retracted by the day, the current economic and market environments are highly uncertain, making informed commentary nearly impossible. So we will not publish our Thoughts on the Current Outlook this quarter. The following are just a few observations about the current tariff fiasco and our current investment views.
In January, we said that we expected market volatility to continue as “we dealt with the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s policies, particularly on taxes, tariffs and immigration.” The new immigration policies are pretty much as expected, with tough talk about enforcement and deportation doing most of the job of discouraging illegal immigration. And work on taxes is just beginning and is not expected to heat up until later this year.
That leaves us with tariffs, which for reasons known only to President Trump, he has chosen to take on ahead of tax policy. We won’t recount the events since his April 2 announcement as they have been global headlines and, more importantly, we are still left with a great deal of uncertainty about where we go from here. In particular, the “tit for tat” dispute with China doesn’t seem like it is leading anywhere, and we just don’t know what kind of deals the President is seeking with other countries.
Bottom line, this kind of irresponsible policy making will hurt our economy, which had been on pretty solid footing, by introducing uncertainty where it didn’t previously exist. More disturbingly, Trump’s trade policies are based on a couple of false premises. The first false premise is that trade deficits are inherently bad. This is just wrong – healthy developing countries should have trade deficits with developed countries as they use their inexpensive labor and natural resources to create products for export, thereby bringing up their own standard of living (and providing cost-effectively produced products to developed countries). This is good for the world economy and benefits both developing and developed countries.
The second false premise is that we can bring large scale manufacturing back to the US. Our labor costs are too high, our labor force too small and our regulatory environment too strict for this to be conceivable. Even if we could solve those issues, it would take many years and untold costs to replicate manufacturing infrastructure that already exists elsewhere. And for what purpose? There may be a few areas, like computer chips, where it makes sense to bring more manufacturing to the US for security reasons. But, for example, why would we want to take clothing and shoe manufacturing away from Vietnam where they have abundant, well-paid labor that can do it at a fraction of the US cost?
We don’t know where this tariff chaos will go because it is entirely in Trump’s hands. For now, we have cut back on small cap stocks and high yield bonds and are not reinvesting until a sustained direction is clearer. As the last two weeks have shown, the risk of a sudden change in course is very high. This is not a time to make significant tactical moves, rather it is important to rely on your longterm strategic asset allocation.