Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  1. New Terms of Trade: Policy, Fiasco or Both?
  2. Markets Diverge (Again)
  3. All Quiet on the Fed Front

We try to tune out the constant drone of noise coming from Washington, for the most part.  Only when a policy change might or will have a fundamental impact on the economy, businesses or individuals, do we take notice.  

The Tax Cut and Jobs Act, enacted last December, has had an enormously positive impact on corporate bottom lines.  By lowering the corporate tax rate by about 40%, corporations now have more cash to pay employees better, invest in business expansion and return more capital to shareholders.  These are all positive changes for companies, workers and investors.  Estimates for growth in the economy have been marked up as have earnings estimates.  And the stock market has reacted as you might expect, boosting prices higher.  

The ride got bumpier in the second quarter, however, as the Trump administration rolled out its new approach to trade in full force.  No country — no matter how close an ally — was immune from the prospective imposition of sizable tariffs.  The biggest target of all is of course China, with whom we arguably have some legitimate reasons to be negotiating better trade terms.  But the apparent scattershot approach being taken is problematic on a couple of levels.  First, with the only discernible rationale for the tariff talk being domestic political gain, negotiations with our trade partners would be difficult because they can’t tell what we really want.  Second, because companies aren’t sure how long these tariffs will be in place (maybe they will change with tomorrow’s Twitter feed…), they are hesitant to invest in or make changes to their global supply chains.  So what we end up with is a state of confusion, which isn’t positive for any economy.

Maybe, as some including the President himself, have suggested, we are ultimately targeting a world in which tariffs are very low or zero.  If so, that would certainly be a welcome outcome.  Another positive result would be a deal with China on intellectual property protections and further opening of their market to US exports.   For now, our concern with the trade tactics is that they may offset many of the positive effects of the corporate tax improvements.  We aren’t concerned about this in the very short term, as the US economy seems to be running on all cylinders.  However, if we look forward a year or two, when our economy is likely to be growing at a slower rate, nearer the long term average, then these trade policy effects could be more detrimental.  

While we are sorting out noise from real change, we view the second quarter’s market divergence as akin to the knee-jerk reactions that took place immediately after the election in late 2016.  Those reactions were reversed in the first half of 2017.  This time, reactions to prospective trade policy, drove US small cap stocks to even more extremes of valuation, while emerging markets were driven down by a stronger dollar and tariff concerns.  Yet, the fundamentals in many emerging markets — which are largely driven by growing middle class consumers and supportive government policies — have not changed at all.  These domestic consumption stories are largely unaffected by US trade policy and they are likely to persist for many years to come.  

The Federal Reserve continued on its gradual tightening path this past quarter, raising short term interest rates by another one-fourth of a percent and continuing to reduce its bond holdings. The bond market took this all in stride, as the Fed’s moves were just as expected.  We, like most investors, expect the Fed to continue raising short term rates quarterly, as they have long telegraphed, so long as employment is strong, the economy is good and inflation is around their 2% goal.  

The only real excitement in the bond market has been whether we are going to see the yield curve “invert” anytime soon.  Often used as a early indicator of a coming recession, a yield curve inversion happens when short term rates are higher than long term rates.  Typically, this happens late in an economic cycle when the Fed is raising rates quickly in an effort to slow the economy.  Eventually, they are typically successful, inducing a recession.  

This time may be a bit different: the Fed is hiking rates slowly, just trying to get them back to a normal level.  We believe long term rates are being held down as demand for US Treasury bonds remains high because US yields are the highest among major developed economies.  We would be more concerned if we were to see rates on lower rated (“junk”) bonds jump up quickly.  In our opinion, this so-called “spread widening” will be a more definitive indicator of an upcoming recession this time around.  

For now, investors are getting close to earning a positive real (after inflation) return on short term bond investments.  We may yet see the day when holding cash in a money market fund is no longer a losing proposition, but rather a reasonably attractive investment!

In client portfolios, we have maintained our significant weight in international stocks, with a preference for Asia over Europe, because of the better growth characteristics of many Asian economies.  And we have held onto US stock positions as the US economy and corporate earnings continue to grow nicely.  Finally, on the flip side of this, we remain underweight in fixed income because that strong growth could lead to higher interest rates, which would hurt bond prices.  

July 11, 2018                  © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

1. Tech and Trade Tantrums

2. Bonds Riskier than Stocks?

3. Bumpy Road Ahead


Facebook went public in 2012 with revenue around $5 billion.  By 2017, just five years later, its revenue had increased eight fold, to more than $40 billion, generating profits of nearly $16 billion.  Yet somehow it escaped the public consciousness that Facebook was selling users’ personal data to generate this enormous profit, sometimes to people who did things we wouldn’t approve of.  To paraphrase Meredith Wilson:  Trouble, oh we got trouble/Right here in River City!/With a capital T/That rhymes with “FB”/And that stands for Facebook.

Since peaking on February 1, the value of Facebook stock has dropped more than 20%.  Surveys show trust in the company has plummeted as well.  The stock of Alphabet, parent of Google and YouTube, also peaked around the same time, amid concerns about new taxes from European regulators.  And lately, Amazon has become President Trump’s favorite Twitter target.  Bottom line, these big cap tech stocks, which had led the market up throughout 2017, have now led it down, about 10% off the peak.  That we had a significant correction coming was no surprise to any serious investor – we had recently set records for low volatility and length of time without a correction.  But questioning the future prospects of these tech titans was real news.

Unfortunately, tech woes weren’t the only things upsetting the markets.  Interest rates on Treasury bonds jumped in the January causing investors to wonder whether stock prices should be ratcheted down because higher rates mean future earnings are worth less.  

And, finally, we come to trade.  Like many a Trump position, it is difficult to separate real policy from posturing for negotiating purposes.  At this writing, the markets are rightfully concerned about the prospect of a growing trade rift with China.  China appears to be taking a measured response to Trump’s planned tariffs but where this will lead is anyone’s guess.  At the same time, the US is attempting to re-negotiate NAFTA with Canada and Mexico.  

Our concern is that the administration is apparently basing its positions on a false premise, i.e., that trade deficits with any country are inherently bad for the US and must be the result of poor trade terms.  Trade deficits are a function of our consuming more than we produce at home.  It’s that simple.  Shifting the terms of trade through tariffs is likely to drive up prices for imports, costing US consumers more and slowing the economy.    Not only is this counterproductive but it takes away some of the benefits of the lower corporate tax rates that were just put into place.  

Meanwhile, the trade issues also add to concerns about inflation, as tariffs on imports drive up prices.  With the unemployment rate already at a very low rate (4.1%) and likely headed lower as job growth remains strong, it is just a matter of time before wages begin to rise more strongly.  And with them will come higher inflation expectations and higher interest rates.   

Gradually rising interest rates are generally okay for investors.  For stock investors, this usually means the economy is doing well and earnings will likely rise, buoying stock prices.  If rates rise too quickly, stock prices typically get marked down as investors are willing to pay less for future earnings as their present value is reduced.  For bond investors, gradually reinvesting their interest payments at higher rates produces higher future income.  The problem arises when rates rise suddenly or unexpectedly.  It’s important to remember that the absolute level of interest rates is still quite low (30 year US Treasury bonds yield about 3%) so bond prices are extraordinarily sensitive to changes in interest rates.  For example, a 1% rise in 30 year Treasury rates from their current level would cause their value to fall about 17%.  We aren’t saying that bonds are necessarily riskier than stocks but, if we were to wake up to markedly higher inflation reports and interest rates, both bonds and stocks could be in for substantial declines. 

One final point about US stocks.  The combination of (1) the recent market correction and (2) the substantial mark-up in earnings estimates due to lower future tax rates makes it look like stocks are trading at close to an average multiple of future earnings. Indeed, we have been able to find some individual stocks trading at quite reasonable prices that we have added to client portfolios.  However, we hasten to point out that those upcoming earnings are benefitting from lower taxes, a weaker dollar, higher energy prices and stable wages.  It is certainly possible that a year from now, none of these factors will be tailwinds.  

On a longer term basis, we are concerned that the recent tax cuts and spending bills enacted by Congress will add very significantly to the budget deficit.  At a time when the economy is growing pretty strongly, we should be looking to reduce the deficit, not add to it.  But in Washington, no one wants to make the hard choices.  And no one gets re-elected by saying we need to make them, either.  The deficit numbers are just too big for us to grow out of them and, ultimately, they make it more difficult for the government to respond to downturns in the economy.  

In 2017, sentiment turned in favor of many international stock markets, particularly those of emerging markets.  The better growth, better earnings and reasonable valuations of these markets had been evident for a little while.  Now that sentiment has been added to the mix, we could see good relative returns for several years, perhaps making up much of their poor performance relative to the US since 2011.  That said, we have some concern that investors will get too excited and push prices to unreasonable levels too quickly.  

While 2017 was a cautionary tale about not letting politics color one’s investing approach, we could be entering a period where government policies have more impact on the investment landscape than they have in the recent past.  Markets usually move on the basis of the expected marginal change in the environment and, so far, that judgment has been that the environment for investors has gotten better.  Lower taxes and less regulation are generally good for companies’ bottom lines.  Uncertainties created by shifting trade, immigration and foreign policies are much less business friendly, and may be less market friendly. 

In client portfolios, we remain underweight in fixed income as we believe the risks far outweigh the small potential rewards.   We have maintained our substantial weight in international stocks and have held onto US stock positions while carefully minding valuations.  


April 6, 2018                  © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  1. Markets Rally on Tax Rate Cuts
  2. Fed Speeds Ahead
  3. Where’s the Inflation?

Twelve months ago, our heads were spinning from a 2016 filled with surprises, culminating in the election of Donald J. Trump as president.  What has been most surprising about 2017 is that the financial markets and the economy greeted the Trump presidency with optimism, good results and low volatility, despite daily headlines filled with plenty of potential distractions.  For now, the markets have focused on the marginal change in direction in Washington: away from more regulation and higher taxes and toward less regulation and lower taxes.  

The tax bill that President Trump promised before Christmas became a reality, to our surprise.  The big headline for the markets is the corporate rate cut from 35% to 21%.  While there are an enormous number of details to work through, this cut will clearly benefit the earnings of a large swath of US public companies.  Perhaps more importantly, it makes the US far more competitive on the world stage and will allow a redirection of resources away from tax avoidance to more productive ends.  

In the near term, there will be some accounting shakeout as companies adjust to changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and book tax liabilities associated with future repatriations of cash held overseas.  But we expect the bottom line impact on corporate earnings will be very positive.  If this number is, as some have predicted, 10%, then the US equity market got cheaper by that amount overnight.  Of course, since the market looks ahead, it has more than fully discounted all of this improvement in the rally we have had since the middle of 2016.  

We are not as sanguine about the potential benefits of the tax law changes for individuals.  First and foremost, the changes are not permanent – they expire at the end of 2025 – which we think is generally bad policy.  Second, the changes are complex so they will take some time for the professionals to fully understand and translate.  Third, the changes will affect consumers across the country in wildly different ways, depending on their personal circumstances.  For now, all we know for sure is that the tax accountants and lawyers will be working more overtime for a long time to come.  

While the stock market proved positively exciting in 2017, the bond markets just let out a big yawn.  The only commonality between the two sets of markets was the lack of volatility.  Comparing year end 2016 to year end 2017, rates on the US Treasury ten year note were flat and the thirty year bond yield actually declined a quarter of a point.  The action was at the short end, where the two year note rate rose nearly three-fourths of a point, in line with the Fed’s three interest rate hikes.  

So long as the Federal Reserve’s three boxes remain checked, we expect it will continue to raise rates consistently throughout 2018 and reduce its balance sheet at a deliberate, well-publicized rate.  Strong economy: check.  Solid employment numbers: check.  Inflation at target: mostly a check.  As the stability in longer term rates demonstrates, the bond market doesn’t seem as convinced as the Fed, particularly about inflation.  

For those old enough to remember Clara Peller and the Wendy’s tagline “Where’s the beef?”, bond investors may be applying to same level of disdain in asking “Where’s the inflation?” With unemployment low and the employment market strong, economic theory and history tell us that we should be seeing much higher wage inflation.  Yet we haven’t seen it and the bond market is waiting for a clear signal on inflation before adjusting longer term rates higher.  History also tells us that this adjustment could be swift and harsh when it does come.  For now, we remain cautious on longer term fixed income investments, with the view that the primary risk is rising rates and falling bond prices. 

As we have been have been saying for some time, international stock markets had everything going for them except sentiment.  That changed in 2017, with many international markets outpacing the strong returns put up by the US stock market.  Part of this story is currency – weakness in the value of the dollar has played a significant role in developed markets’ excess returns.  But more important, we believe, is that these markets have found what they were missing previously: better sentiment.   The better growth, better earnings and reasonable valuations pieces of the puzzle had been evident for a little while.  Now that sentiment has been added to the mix, we could see good relative returns for some time.  That said, some markets may have already gone too far in the short term.

Finally, 2017 was a cautionary tale about letting the divisiveness of politics color one’s investing approach.  A year ago, a great deal of uncertainty reigned, with all sorts of wild predictions about the bad things that might happen.  Yet, as usual, the institutions of our democracy and economy remained intact, if a bit shaken, and we are enjoying a strong economy, low inflation and relative peace.  That is certainly not to say that there aren’t risks but it is important to keep them in perspective.  Markets tend to move on the basis of the expected marginal change in the environment and, so far, that judgment has been that the environment for investors has gotten better.  This phenomenon wasn’t limited to the US: one of the best places to invest in 2017 was South Korea, where the stock market gained more than 40%.  

In client portfolios, we remain underweight in fixed income as we believe the risks far outweigh the small potential rewards.   We have let our already substantial weight in international stocks continue to grow and have held onto US stock positions while carefully minding relative valuations.  Finally, we are fine-tuning our line up of hedged strategies to focus on managers we expect to deliver better returns than bonds but with less risk than stocks.  

January 12, 2018                  © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  1. Low Expectations for DC
  2. Fed Scorecard: Three Pluses
  3. International Markets Optimism

Stock markets around the world continued their rallies in the third quarter.  The US was no exception, with major averages closing the quarter at record highs. Increasingly, investors are recognizing that better economic and earnings growth prospects are breaking out broadly.  Correspondingly, the US dollar has weakened, enhancing the returns on non-dollar-denominated financial assets and improving the overseas revenues of US companies.  

The bond market’s boring streak continued through the third quarter.  Despite some intra-quarter volatility in longer term rates, spreads and rates ended the quarter pretty close to where they started.  Credit spreads remain relatively tight, though not at record levels, reflecting a still-positive economic outlook.  

It is tempting to let the state of US politics color our investing views but it is important to keep a long term perspective.  For the most part, we believe the current dysfunction in Washington is just a continuation of the sharp divide we have seen for the last decade.  The issues and debates have morphed – and seemingly change at the speed of Twitter – but the net result is largely the same: very little change on important policy matters and no effort to address long term fiscal problems.  

This state of affairs informs our base view that nothing major will come out of Congress on Obamacare repeal/replace/repair (a zombie issue at this point), income tax changes and infrastructure programs.  At this writing, tax “reform” is foremost on the Washington agenda.  However, absent any savings from changes to Obamacare, the scoring of a “lower rates, fewer deductions” strategy will make it extremely difficult for Congress to enact as part of a budget reconciliation process.  As a reminder, budget reconciliation only requires a simple majority to pass BUT the changes must be revenue neutral over the budget window of 10 years.  Because bipartisan solutions are just not in the Washington playbook anymore, we expect a lot of discussion but very little action.  Bottom line, we believe the only help the economy will get from Washington for the next few years will be a reduced focus on regulation, which can be done administratively.  

Meanwhile, the moves by the Federal Reserve to gradually reduce its support for the economy have been met with guarded optimism.  The Fed has raised the Federal funds rate very slowly and cumulatively we have now seen four quarter point increases in two years.  And we could see a similar number over the next eighteen months, if things play out as the Fed expects. In addition, the Fed intends to stick to its plan to reduce its bond holdings by not reinvesting all of the proceeds of bond maturities each month, starting this month.  

So long as the Fed’s three key boxes – reasonable economic growth, strong employment and inflation near target – remain checked, we believe they will continue to raise short term rates slowly and reduce their balance sheet deliberately.  The bond market doesn’t seem as convinced as the Fed right now though.  Longer term rates have stayed low, perhaps a sign that investors are concerned the Fed will tighten too much, bringing inflation and growth down.  Complicating the picture is that, even at current low levels, US Treasury bond yields look attractive by comparison to rates on comparable European and Japanese debt.  We aren’t sure how this will be resolved but we remain cautious on fixed income investments, with the view that the primary risk is rising rates and falling bond prices.  

Finally, non US stocks have been a bright spot for investors this year, with developed market equities handily outpacing their US counterparts.  Bigger gains were found in emerging markets, which have nearly doubled the returns of US stocks.  Part of this story is currency – weakness in the value of the dollar has played a significant role in developed markets’ excess returns.  But more important, we believe, is that these markets have found what they were missing previously: better sentiment.   The better growth, better earnings and reasonable valuations pieces of the puzzle had been evident for a little while.  Now that sentiment has been added to the mix, we could see good relative returns for some time.  That said, some markets may have already gone too far in the short term. 

In client portfolios, we modestly increased our already substantial weight in international stocks, funded by a small reduction in the weight assigned to US stocks.  We also made several shifts in hedged strategies to focus on managers and strategies we believe can deliver attractive, but lower risk, return opportunities.  As noted above, we remain underweight fixed income as we expect returns will be low while risk remains high.  We are continuing to evaluate the role of fixed income in portfolios with very long term time horizons. 

October 10, 2017              © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  1. Better Growth Expectations Fading? 
  2. Fed Staying Ahead
  3. Non US Markets Picking Up

The resurgent growth narrative (lower taxes + less regulation = improved growth) continued through much of the second quarter.  For the first two months of the quarter, a small group of very large cap technology stocks dominated the returns of the market indices, causing some investors to see visions of 1999.  As these technology stocks sold off in June, health care, industrial and financial stocks took over the market leadership, leaving market levels at or near all time highs at quarter end.  

In many ways, the bond market’s second quarter looked much like the first.  Treasury yields declined, spreads in credit sensitive sectors tightened further and non-dollar debt generally appreciated as the dollar weakened.  The bond market also absorbed another one-quarter percent hike in the Federal Funds rate without much reaction.  

Because short term rates were raised while long term rates were declining, the spread between short and long term rates narrowed further.  This spread is something we will keep a careful eye on because further narrowing could be an indicator of economic weakness to come.  The other indicator we are watching is the spread between high yield corporate bonds and comparable maturity Treasury bond rates.  If this spread begins a sustained rise, this may also portend weakness in the equity markets and a potential recession on the horizon.  Given that we are about eight years into this economic expansion, we need to be vigilant in looking for signs of future weakness. 

Some of the stock market’s current buoyancy is based on expected fiscal stimulus from lower tax rates.   With Obamacare repeal and replace on life support, keeping tax reform “revenue neutral” will be a much more difficult task.  As a result, a meaningful reduction in tax rates is unlikely.  On the plus side, reducing (or just not introducing new) regulation is something the administration has in its sights and could well make progress on. 

Another restraint on growth will be tighter monetary policy.  As we look at the Federal Reserve’s objectives, we see the table set for continued “normalization” of interest rates and reduction of the Fed’s balance sheet.  The US economy is growing at or near its potential, inflation is just shy of the Fed’s 2% target and the employment picture is solid with unemployment well under 5% and monthly job additions pretty strong.  As long as all three of these boxes (economy, inflation, jobs) stay checked, we believe the Fed will continue to raise rates gradually and will begin to reduce the size of its balance sheet according to the plan they laid out recently. 

Speaking of the Fed, we have heard more chatter from Fed members recently with concerns about stock market valuations.  While there are certainly pockets of excess valuation, we don’t believe the 1999 analogy is apt at this point for a couple of reasons.  First, concentrations of value are not out of line with historical averages.  Second, many of these highly valued companies are growing real earnings at high rates, justifying higher price to earnings ratios.  However, we are far more concerned about excessive valuations of stocks in many large, slow growing companies.  Many of these stocks have P/E ratios that are 4 or 5 times their growth rates – a very unattractive valuation – yet investors appear complacent.  We think the Fed chatter is more likely to indicate that they are putting normalization of rates ahead of supporting markets.  

Outside the US, North Korea is right where it wants to be – in the center of controversy over its nuclear capabilities.  So far, there has been little but tough talk from both sides.  China is the key to solving this problem - it will be quite interesting to see if President Trump and his team can work out a diplomatic deal that China will fully support.

Meanwhile, President Trump’s first meeting with Vladimir Putin seems to have mollified critics for now.  That said, the surrounding G20 meeting provided much less enthusiasm for Mr. Trump’s America First agenda.  Interestingly, this confab took place in the context of a growing view that many non US economies are improving quite nicely.  And if you believe that policy is translated quickly into currency movements, then the still weakening dollar says a lot.  

Stronger economies and currencies propelled non US stock markets to a very strong first half.  We believe this may be the beginning of a longer term trend but only time will tell.  Many of these markets have everything going for them (supportive central banks, increasing growth and reasonable valuations) except sentiment.  And sentiment can change quickly with positive returns and supportive cash flows.   

We have kept asset allocations relatively stable in client portfolios.  While being cautious about deploying new cash, we have not reduced US equity exposures meaningfully despite a good first half of the year.  We continue to believe that non US stocks provide a more compelling value proposition than US stocks and hold a substantial weighting.  Finally, we continue to evaluate fixed income and alternative investment opportunities as returns from these areas have been disappointing.  As a result, client portfolios contain somewhat more cash than usual.  


July 11, 2017            © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  1.  Markets Expecting Better Growth
  2.  ACA Fail, Taxes Next?
  3.  Fed on Target for a Change

Optimism about the potential positive impact of the Trump agenda continued through the first quarter.  However, the impact was felt more broadly across the US stock market than it was in the two months immediately following the election.  

The traditional growth sectors of the economy – technology, health care and consumer discretionary – led the stock market up in the first quarter.  Stocks of financial, energy and industrial companies lagged the market.  Small cap stocks also underperformed after a strong, quick run in late 2016.  

Meanwhile, the bond market was positively subdued, compared to the fireworks than ensued immediately after the election.  Even the dollar was a bit of surprise, giving back a good chunk of its post-election gains.  

It would not be surprising to see volatility in the markets pick up from here.  While the failure of the Republican effort to repeal and replace Obamacare didn’t set the markets back, a similar failure on tax reform could.  We believe the markets’ current optimism is based partly on expected fiscal stimulus from lower tax rates.   

In any negotiation of this magnitude there will be winners and losers.  With Obamacare repeal and replace apparently off the table, keeping tax reform “revenue neutral” will be a much bigger task.  And, if the so-called border adjustment tax proposal also falls off the table, then reducing tax rates in any meaningful way will become very difficult.  

This assumes that some fiscal discipline is attached to the tax negotiations. The US fiscal deficit will begin growing in the next few years as entitlement obligations expand, particularly for retiring baby boomers.  In our view, sharply higher deficit spending, either on tax cuts or infrastructure, could lead inflation and interest rates much higher, choking off the growth they were intended to create. 

As we have been saying for some time, there are some sobering realities that serve to limit the potential growth of the US economy.  First is the structural issue that an economy’s growth potential is the sum of the growth in the labor force and the productivity of that labor force.  Labor force growth is pretty well set for the next 5-10 years at around 0.5%, which leaves productivity as the wild card.  Except for the 1990s, recent productivity growth has averaged around 1%.  Even if we doubled that, we still only get real growth of 2.5%.We may feel a bit better about that 2.5% real growth if inflation stays around the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.  

Speaking of the Federal Reserve, we believe the other governor on growth will be tighter monetary policy.  As we look at the Fed’s objectives, we see the table set for continued “normalization” of interest rates and the Fed’s balance sheet.  The US economy is growing at or near its new potential rate, inflation is right around the 2% target and the employment picture is solid with unemployment under 5% and falling.  As long as all three of these boxes stay checked, we believe the Fed will continue to raise rates gradually and will, with some advance notice, begin to reduce the size of its balance sheet.  The Fed will be deliberate, however, erring to the side of more stimulus rather than less.  

From the Middle East to East Asia, geopolitical events have grabbed the headlines.  In particular, North Korea seems hell-bent on provoking confrontation with the US and its East Asian allies.  It will be quite interesting to see if President Trump and his team can work with the Chinese to defuse this situation.  Both sides have much to gain by working together.  

There was very little reported immediately after the meeting between President Trump and President Xi but both North Korea and trade were on the agenda.  It is certainly a positive sign that the two leaders met in person and have continued their discussions by phone.  We also hope that the preparations for upcoming meetings will set the stage for a more nuanced set of trade policies from the Trump administration.  

In Europe, the United Kingdom has kicked off the process of exiting from the European Union.  It remains to be seen how much real impact Brexit will have on the economies of the UK and the European continent.  Even while the European economy is showing signs of life, surprises in the upcoming elections in France and Germany this year could alter that course.      

We have kept asset allocations relatively stable in client portfolios.  While being cautious about deploying new cash, we have not reduced equity exposures meaningfully despite a strong first quarter.  We continue to believe that non US stocks provide a more compelling value proposition than US stocks.  Finally, we are re-evaluating fixed income investments as we believe that positive real returns will be hard to achieve in that space.  

April 11, 2017            © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved


Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  1.    Markets Herald The Trump Era
  2.    Trade and Tax Wildcards
  3.    Growing Inflation, Rising Rates

It has been two months since Donald J. Trump pulled off a surprise victory in the US Presidential election.  With the Republicans also retaining strong control of the House of Representatives and weak control of the Senate, the GOP has effective control of the Washington agenda for at least the next two years.  

Surprising many pundits, stock markets did not react negatively to this news.  Indeed, we have seen a strong rally in certain parts of the market that are expected to fare well under a Trump presidency.  His agenda is expected to focus on corporate and individual tax cuts, deregulation, infrastructure spending and health care changes.  This pro-business agenda caused a spike in interest rates on US Treasury bonds and fueled a sharp dollar rally.

Predictably enough, the sectors that rallied were banks (beneficiaries of deregulation and higher interest rates), industrial companies (more infrastructure spending) and energy-related companies (less restrictions on development and transportation).  The biggest beneficiaries were small capitalization companies in these areas which not only have proportionally more to gain but whose US-centric businesses will not be affected by a stronger dollar.  

It is our job to look beyond the short term reactions to the longer term fundamentals that are likely to affect our capital markets for the next several years.  First, we believe a reduced focus on new regulations (and even a rollback in some of the regulations that were put in place during the Obama era) will be a fundamentally positive development for the business environment.  It is very difficult to put a value on this shift but if the initial improvement in business sentiment can be sustained, that will benefit the US economy.  

Opening up the tax reform debate is a dual edged sword from our perspective.  Certainly, our corporate tax structure is in dire need of change not only to rationalize it but to make the US more competitive in the world economy.  Currently, enormous amounts of resources are expended to set up structures to allow corporations to take advantage of more favorable tax regimes elsewhere in the world.  However, in any negotiation of this magnitude there are likely to be winners and losers.  Our biggest concern is that tax policy could become a tool for trade policy and, on this latter point, we believe the Trump inclinations could be dangerous to the world economy.    It is too soon to tell whether the tough talk on free trade is just that or will be followed up with counterproductive measures.  

While we aren't necessarily fans of the current tax rate structure for individuals, the current system has one huge advantage over the scheme it replaced: permanence.   Looking back over the first decade of this millennium, the phasing ins and phasing outs of various rates and tax provisions were head-spinning, creating needless uncertainty.  We hope that some fiscal discipline is attached to the tax negotiations as well. The US fiscal deficit will begin growing in the next few years as entitlement obligations expand, particularly for retiring baby boomers.  In our view, sharply higher deficit spending, either on tax cuts or infrastructure could lead inflation and interest rates much higher, choking off the growth they were intended to create.

Even though there are many reasons to be optimistic that growth may well accelerate in the coming years, there are some sobering realities that serve to limit that potential growth.  First is the structural issue that an economy’s growth potential is the sum of the growth in the labor force and the productivity of that labor force.  Labor force growth is pretty much baked in for the next 5-10 years at around 0.5%, which leaves productivity as the wild card.  Save for the 1990s, recent productivity growth has averaged around 1%.  Even if we doubled that, we still only get real growth of 2.5%.

We may feel a bit better about that 2.5% real growth though because inflation is likely to pick up, giving us higher nominal (total) growth.   With the economy nearly at full employment, wages have begun to rise more quickly.  Combine this with stable or rising oil prices (off a low base) and we should expect higher inflation reports ahead.

Speaking of inflation, we believe the other governor on growth may be interest rates.  We have already seen a healthy rise in the ten year Treasury bond rate, which is most commonly used in setting mortgage rates.  And the Fed is likely to hike short term rates further in 2017, especially if we see wage gains and inflation reports exceeding their targets.  The economy is strong enough to withstand a gradual increase in rates and businesses (not to mention savers) will welcome a return to more “normal” interest rate levels.  However, there is clearly a risk that rates could rise too quickly, damaging the financial and housing markets.  

Our asset allocations views are shifting gradually.  We have reduced and will likely continue reducing the allocations to hedged strategies.  Returns in this area have largely been disappointing and we believe the period ahead is not likely to be any more kind.  We continue underweight in fixed income, focusing on strategies that will do well in a rising rate world.  Among stocks, we are adding cautiously to US equities, while maintaining exposure to growth opportunities elsewhere in the world.   

January 17, 2017              © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  •     Big rally in credit continues

  •     Central banks stay at center stage

  •     Slow growth begets low returns

The positive tone of the financial markets that kicked off in mid-February continued through the third quarter.  US stocks ended the quarter near historical highs, helped by a mid-September decision by the Federal Reserve not to raise short term interest rates.  With an accommodative Fed, decent economic growth and steady oil prices, prices on corporate bonds rallied strongly, while US Treasury yields stayed relatively stable. 

International stocks rose more than their US counterparts in the third quarter as investors realized that Brexit implementation is going to take several years.  In addition, scares about capital flight and slow economic growth in China subsided for now.  

The Federal Reserve surprised almost no one by not raising rates in mid-September.  Still, investors’ nerves were calmed, even though the Fed made it clear that it could raise rates at any upcoming meeting.  December now seems like a likely choice but the markets remain somewhat skeptical.  Just as the Fed has earned a reputation for being too positive about future economic growth, it is also earning a reputation for being easily derailed from hiking rates by events unrelated to the US labor market and inflation.  Meanwhile, the US labor market continues to gain strength and inflation is beginning to appear.  We think the Fed now risks getting behind the curve and having to hike more quickly than it would like next year.  

The central banks of Europe and Japan are trying to strongly encourage growth and inflation, with relatively little success.  In Europe, the central bank continued its asset purchase plan, similar to the quantitative easing we had here in the US, except that their plan includes a broader range of bond types.  In recent days, concerns have arisen about Deutsche Bank’s capital adequacy, if it is required to pay large fines to settle with the US government over mortgage crisis transgressions.  This will pose an interesting dilemma for the German government, as a 2008-like bailout is politically untenable.  

In Japan, negative rates are still in effect and attention has gradually been shifting toward more creative ways to generate growth and inflation.  So far, nothing has broken the long-ingrained expectations of falling prices and a stagnant economy.  

With stock prices going up while earnings are flat, investors are paying pretty high prices for future earnings, particularly here in the US.  This may be okay so long as interest rates are stable and earnings begin to grow.  But if longer term rates were to start rising with inflation expectations, the prices that investors are willing to pay for stocks may tumble.  Particularly vulnerable, we believe, are high dividend, low growth stocks that have been bid up for their dividend yields.  These normally defensive stocks could be much less stable during the next market decline.  

As the market gains clarity about the US presidential election, it would be typical to see a rally in stocks between now and year end.  However, the new president will face a long list of problems that have been left unattended because of the unwillingness to compromise from either side.  We can only hope that the new president takes a constructive path forward, working with Congress to address some of the nations problems.  

Our core views about the outlook for the financial markets remain unchanged.  

Global growth will be slow.  The EU was already in slow growth mode and Brexit confirms that there will be no breakout to the upside soon.  China’s growth rate is coming down but the base is now large enough for it to still be a major contributor to global growth.  We continue to believe that the US is stuck in a 1-2% real growth economy for some time to come.   The first two quarters of 2016 have confirmed that trend.   

Interest rates will stay lower for longer.  Interest rates in the US may rise a bit as wage inflation makes an appearance but will be held down on the short end by a reluctant Federal Reserve and on the long end by lower yields available on sovereign debt in Europe and Japan.  

Positive investment returns will be hard to find.  We are neutral on US large cap stocks while staying negative on US small caps.  Outside the US, we favor a mix of carefully selected active stock fund managers, including those with dedicated emerging market and Asia exposures.  The hedged strategy portion of most portfolios is relatively large as we maintain our underweights to bonds and US small cap.  In most portfolios, we initiated a small position in a diversified commodity basket as an inflation hedge.  Despite these shadings in our investment allocations, we still aren’t excited about any asset class right now.  

We will summarize by reiterating that we see lots of potential sources of volatility and not many sources of great prospective returns.  This combination of low expected future returns and high risk is not a hospitable environment for investors.  We are emphasizing a broad diversity of strategies in client portfolios and expect to use volatility to clients’ advantage when we believe it is appropriate.  


October 7, 2016                © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:


• Populism strikes markets

• Volatility almost everywhere

• Attractive returns hard to find


We have long been advocates of leaving politics aside when it comes to planning investments as changes tend to be evolutionary, not revolutionary, given the checks and balances built into the US system of government.  However, in this uniquely wild presidential election year, there is a distinctive edge to the fervor on both sides and growing sentiment for “none of the above” as a write-in candidate.  Beneath the surface of this fervor are some underlying trends which bear watching as they hold the potential for significant impact on the world economy and financial markets.  

The (apparently) successful candidacy of Donald Trump, the huge support given to Bernie Sanders, and the surprising vote by the United Kingdom to exit the European Union all indicate that a large segment of citizens is not satisfied with a current system which they believe has treated them unfairly.  Note I said system, not just policies.  In each case, the proponents want to throw out the current system (immigration, banking and free trade, to name a few -- feel free to mix and match as you like) but don’t seem to have a compelling alternative to offer.  Indeed, in the UK, it has been interesting to see the politicians who led the LEAVE movement stand aside saying their work is finished.  Unfortunately, the real work has not even begun, leaving political and economic uncertainty for some time to come.  

It doesn’t take a vivid imagination to see how these “throw out the system” sentiments could lead to harmful changes to the world economy, global financial markets and geopolitical relationships.  That said, each of these movements is based on real concerns that have not been effectively addressed by current governments and their policies.  

All of this background supports our investment view that heightened volatility in the financial markets is likely to continue and may well get worse before it gets better.  For example, we saw a strong selloff after the Brexit surprise and then an equally strong rally back in short order.  We don’t believe we are out of the woods by any means as the actual effects are only beginning to be identified, much less actually felt.   

For now, politics seems to have shoved aside the more substantive economic issues we should still be quite concerned about: where are oil prices headed…will China be able to transition to a services economy without a crash landing…will the US dollar stay strong…and, of course, when will the Federal Reserve finally embark on a sustained increase in interest rates.  An even more pressing and puzzling question is what will be the ultimate impact of negative interest rates on a large share of global sovereign debt?

While we don’t believe we know the answers to any of these questions in advance, there are a few clear implications in the questions themselves.  

First, global growth will continue to be quite slow.  The EU was already in slow growth mode and Brexit confirms that there will be no breakout to the upside anytime soon.  China’s growth rate is coming down, probably faster than they care to admit, but the base is now large enough for it to still be a major contributor to global growth.  We continue to believe that the US is stuck in a 1-2% real growth economy for some time to come.   The first quarter’s number just confirmed that trend.   

Second, interest rates will stay lower for longer.  At this writing, US Treasury yields are at historic lows as investors seek safety over return.  While this flight to safety may fade over the coming months, US rates are being pulled down by much lower interest rates on government debt across the globe.  

Third, sources of positive investment returns will continue to be hard to find.  We continue to be neutral on US large cap stocks while staying negative on US small caps.  Outside the US, we favor a mix of carefully selected active stock fund managers, including those with dedicated emerging market and Asia exposures.  The hedged strategy portion of most portfolios continues to grow as we maintain our underweights to bonds and US small cap.  Despite these shadings in our investment allocations, we have a hard time getting excited about any asset class right now.  

Fourth, in the short term, currency re-alignments may have an outsized impact on returns.  Predictably, the British pound suffered a big decline after the surprise Brexit result.  However, the Euro stayed relatively stable and the Japanese yen rallied strongly.  The yen rally this year has been particularly surprising as Japanese economic results have been somewhat disappointing and the central bank shows no signs of slowing its easing program.  Meanwhile, stability in oil prices around $50 per barrel has allowed some strength to return to the currencies of big oil producing countries.  Finally, political change in Brazil gave rise to some optimism about Brazil’s future, affording a rally in its currency.  

We will summarize by reiterating that we see lots of potential sources of volatility and not many sources of great prospective returns.  This combination of low expected future returns and high risk is not a hospitable environment for investors.  We continue to emphasize a broad diversity of strategies in client portfolios and expect to use volatility to clients’ advantage when we believe it is appropriate.  


July 7, 2016            © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  •     Recession?  What recession…

  •     Dollar bulls run out of steam

  •     Europe: Opportunity in chaos? 

On February 9th, we published a piece in this space entitled “Markets on Recession Watch.”  In it, we noted that the US financial markets were strongly reacting to the possibility of an impending recession, induced by a credit crisis in the energy sector.  Yet, as we noted, several key ingredients for a recession were missing: an inverted yield curve, a consumer pullback and high energy prices.

Three days after publication, on the back of stabilizing energy prices, stocks and credit spreads began a big reversal.  By quarter end, stocks had more than made up the 10+% loss posted in the first several weeks of the year, finishing in positive territory for the quarter.  Similarly, high yield bonds turned in a solidly positive quarter after an abysmal start.  

As if on cue, subsequent economic reports showed solid consumer income and spending, supported by a strong employment outlook.  However, oil prices have not been able to hold their strong rally.  It is too soon to tell if this is just a “too far too fast” pause or a resumption of the oil bear market.  Regardless, the negative impact of low energy prices on the credit markets will continue for some time, with the ever present possibility of spillover effects. 

On the positive side, the employment picture continues to improve on several fronts.  After falling consistently since 2009, the labor force participation rate has ticked up for the last few months, as a large number of previously sidelined potential workers rejoined the labor force.  In addition, we are finally seeing some wage growth.  This well could be the beginning of a stronger move up in employment costs, something the Federal Reserve has been predicting (too early) for some time.  

Meanwhile, aggregate GDP growth for the first quarter will look somewhat weak but it will be positive and not materially out of the 1.5% vicinity that we believe is now normal.  With growth this low, there is always a heightened risk that unexpected events could throw us into recession.  We need to get accustomed to living with this risk.  

Long time readers will recall our continued preference for non-US stock markets, primarily for valuation reasons.  With few exceptions, this preference has brought much disappointment as international stocks have dramatically underperformed their US counterparts over the last several years.  

The first quarter continued this trend, with the surprising exception of emerging markets.  Higher oil prices, dollar weakness and potential political change in Brazil all provided sparks to both the currencies and the stocks.  Further easing announcements by the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan brought strength, not weakness, to the Euro and the Yen.  Unfortunately, this reaction says more about the perceived impotence of central bankers than it does about the success of their policies.

China’s capital flight “crisis,” which naysayers were using to predict a major devaluation of the Yuan, has seemingly vanished as recent reports show a rebuilding of currency reserves.  Add all of these developments up and the US dollar took a beating in the first quarter.  We believe this was overdue, after a very long winning streak for the greenback. That said, we don’t think the dollar is in for prolonged weakness either, just some stabilization.  

We have previously noted our concern about the long term effects of the Syrian refugee crisis on Europe and the resulting implications for managing the Eurozone economies.  The recent, tragic terror attacks in Paris and Brussels have highlighted weaknesses in the open border system and the still strongly nationalistic views about how to respond.  Unfortunately, also highlighted is the inability of the bloc to respond to the crisis in any unified way.  

The Eurozone economy remains on fragile ground, still in the early stages of recovery from a series of small recessions after the Great Recession of 2007-2009.  An upcoming referendum by Great Britain on its membership in the European Union adds to an already uncertain environment.  For the last several years, reports of the imminent demise of common currency were overblown (often authored by those outside the currency regime cheering for its failure).  We have believed that the central players (Germany and France, most importantly) would figure out a way to make the experiment work given their overarching objective of internal peace.   However, the schisms laid bare by the refugee crisis and exacerbated by terrorism shake our optimism.  We hope these challenges become a unifying, not dividing, force.  

Last quarter, we summarized our outlook by saying that this “leaves us with lots of potential sources of volatility and not many sources of great prospective returns.”  Little did we know how prophetic this would be of the first quarter of 2016!   The combination of low expected future returns and high risk is not a hospitable environment for investors.  Among individual stocks, we are focused on companies that can grow revenue and profits at healthy rates even in a slow growth environment.   Finally, we are adding to investments in hedged strategies that control risk, as we expect the markets to continue to be volatile.   

April 7, 2016              © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Markets on Recession Watch

Just five weeks into the new year, stocks have taken a beating across the globe.  Continuing a trend we saw beginning in early 2015, stocks of a small number of very large US companies have been the best place to be.  Almost everything else -- US small caps, other developed market stocks and emerging market stocks -- has done poorly, with many segments already in bear market territory.  

And, after initially reflecting concerns about the impact of the enormous decline in oil prices, spreads on high yield bonds have continued to widen across industries, reaching normal recession levels.  Even spreads on high quality US corporate bonds have now reached a level typically associated with recessions.  Conversely, investors have flocked to the perceived safety of US Treasury Bonds, driving yields down and prices up very significantly.  

All of these market reactions are classic signs of an impending recession.  However, we are missing some typical ingredients.  First is that the yield curve usually inverts (short term rates higher than long term rates) ahead of recessions.  This will be hard to achieve with short term interest rates so low and, with the markets having tightened financial conditions, it seems very unlikely that the Federal Reserve will raise rates further this year.  

Second, the US consumer needs to stumble.  So far, consumer spending has been very consistent if not spectacular.   Consumer leverage is low and the employment market still seems to be on solid ground.  Indeed, the most recent reports on jobs show good wage growth, longer work weeks and strong openings.  Only initial jobless claims are a bit weaker than expected -- something we need to keep an eye on.  

Finally, we are missing high oil prices, another common ingredient in the recession recipe.  Near term prospects for price increases seem pretty dim as inventories are very high, weather is mild, demand is growing modestly and supply continues at a high level.  Of course, cutbacks in capital investments and employment in the energy sector will continue to be a drag on growth here in the US.  

All of this said, we believe the risk of recession continues to rise.  Economic growth in the US is weak by historical standards (although our belief is that 1.5 - 2.0% growth is the rate we should expect based on workforce growth and productivity trends), leaving us little cushion to absorb shocks.  

Persistently low oil prices raise the risk of shock from several sources: geopolitical conflicts, bank credit problems and adverse credit market events.  And we have to add into the mix the impact of a slowing China, particularly on capital flows and currencies throughout that part of the world.  

Bottom line, the markets have real reason to worry so we are remaining somewhat cautious in our investment stance for client portfolios.  We continue to add to hedged strategies in pursuit of reasonable returns at moderate risk.  

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

  •   A bear hug for oil

  •   Collision of the economic and political in China

  •   Higher risk, lower return prospects call for caution

Energy prices remain firmly in the grip of a major bear market.  In the near term, production is expected to stay elevated with OPEC not budging and Iran output expected to add to the glut.  Meanwhile, demand is relatively stable as the world remains in slow growth mode.  If US production begins to fall off in 2016, forced by the financial realities of low oil prices, then we could see some stabilization in the supply/demand imbalance.  

Expectations of defaults on energy-related high yield bonds caused ripples across the entire high yield bond market late in 2015. This is certainly a warning sign that actual energy defaults could create problems across the credit markets.

Two other energy related matters are surprising.  First, we have not seen much of an energy savings “dividend” in consumer spending.  This usually takes some time to play out but we would have thought we would be seeing more of it by now.  Second, rising tensions in the Middle East (Russia joining the Syrian fighting, open feuding between Iran and Saudi Arabia) should lead to stable or higher oil prices.  That has simply not been the case as investors believe the supply/demand imbalance will continue despite these developments.  Apparently, it will take an event that actually changes the supply situation to jolt the markets.  

In China, the year started with a big drop in the A share market as concerns about currency devaluation and expirations of selling bans came front and center.  Imposition of a poorly designed circuit breaker deepened the uncertainties and contributed to selling pressures in stocks around the globe.  It’s important to remember that the A share market is primarily for locals and does not represent a major portion of Chinese wealth.  

The Chinese authorities are trying very hard to balance four things: (1) a long term transition to a service oriented economy which means substantially lower, but more sustainable, growth; (2) a gradual transition to a freely floating currency, when the market is expecting a dramatic devaluation; (3) developing open stock and bond markets that can support a market based economy; and (4) cracking down on dissension and perceived corruption on the part of those who don't fully support the government’s policies.  

Any one of these initiatives would be incredibly difficult in an economy the size of China’s.  But trying to do all four invites policy mistakes.  We have seen several missteps already and will likely see more.  Our greatest concerns are at the point of intersections of the initiatives, particularly when “corruption” could be defined to include market-based selling of stocks, bonds or currencies at a time when the government wants them bought.  This is a sure way to delay the development of the markets.  We should expect continued bouts of volatility as authorities work through this learning process. 

Halfway across the globe, we continue to be concerned about the impact of the refugee crisis on Europe.  These concerns are heightened now that weakness in the immigration system has been linked with terrorism.  All this adds to uncertainty against a weak economic backdrop.  The European central bank is trying hard to stimulate growth and inflation but so far they have met with limited success.  

Finally, here at home, our economy continues to muddle along at an expectedly slow rate.  The employment picture remains pretty strong and so far inflation has been quite limited.  At some point, we may see a pickup in wage inflation as employers are forced to pay more to hire a dwindling supply of available workers.  That assumes the economy doesn’t stall before then.  

The Fed is certainly counting on this return of inflation as it plans further rate hikes over the course of this year.  But the Fed’s track record is mostly on the “too optimistic” side of things.  Recognizing this, the markets don't believe the Fed will raise rates sharply, as short term rates have moved up modestly and long term rates have stayed stable after the Fed’s first hike.    

Slow growth and low inflation leave us with low nominal growth, which means low growth in earnings for companies.  And if inflation picks up because of wage pressures, that could hurt corporate profitability further.  Bottom line, we expect corporate profits to be weak generally, particularly absent a bounce in oil.  One possible bright spot could be a stable dollar, which would eliminate the large drag on revenues and profits that last year’s strong dollar had.  

So where does all of this leave us?  Quite honestly, it leaves us with lots of potential sources of volatility and not many sources of great prospective returns.  The combination of low returns and high risk is not a hospitable environment for investors.  Among individual stocks, we are focused on companies that can continue to grow revenue and profits at healthy rates even in a relatively weak environment.  We continue to add to investments in the “alternative strategy” space, mostly in long short equity or debt strategies, seeking moderate returns with moderate risk.  Finally, we are far underweight US small cap stocks as we view that category as high risk with quite uncertain rewards in the period ahead.  

January 13, 2016              © Essential Investment Partners, LLC             All Rights Reserved

Thoughts on the Current Outlook

Three Key Thoughts:

•    Fed in a quandary with conditions tighter before rate hike

•    Risk of recession rises as weaker growth leaves less cushion

•    Middle East uncertainty grows

In 2014, the US Federal Reserve wound down its “quantitative easing” program (buying of US Treasury and agency mortgage bonds) with little apparent impact on economic growth, bond rates or stock prices.  Some of the volatility we experienced this year is likely a lagged effect from the termination of that program.  More important, we believe, is that investors have been obsessed with the first prospective Fed rate hikes since 2007.  

In being so obsessed, the markets have largely discounted in the effects of one or even two rate increases.  The value of the dollar is much higher against virtually all other currencies, credit spreads have widened to levels not seen since 2008, stocks have wobbled, volatility has increased and the narrative is now about whether the global economy is too weak.  

Having achieved these tighter financial conditions with the mere threat of an initial rate rise, we suspect the Fed now finds itself in a quandary: should they get it over with (how much worse could it be…) or do they risk making conditions even tighter, maybe causing a pullback in a weak growth environment.  We have long believed that the Fed will keep rates lower for longer than most investors (and the Fed itself) expects.  That said, markets would have been well-served by the Fed getting an initial hike out of the way, rather than leaving the prospect out there for investors to worry about.  

Bottom line, however, we view this debate as a near term financial market obsession rather than something likely to have a major impact on the growth rate of the US economy.  As we have said repeatedly, we expect the US economy to grow at around a 2% rate for the next several years.  At that slow rate, a recession is always a risk because of the small margin available to absorb any shocks.  Conversely, we think an overheating economy with rapidly rising inflation is a highly unlikely scenario.  

This rising risk of recession is reflected in the growing spreads on investment grade and high yield debt.  Earlier this year, spreads on debt of energy issuers blew out to very wide levels, as investors expect a wave of defaults in that space beginning in the next several months.  However, that uncertainty has spread more broadly to corporate issuers who have used low rates to increase the leverage on their balance sheets at low cost.  

The geopolitics of oil is certainly complicating the picture as well.  On a pure supply and demand basis, we are oversupplied in the short term, which will keep prices subdued.  And, with the Iran nuclear deal moving forward, the supply picture will likely get worse before demand begins to catch up.  On the flip side, unrest is bubbling up throughout the Middle East once again and no one can predict how the conflicts might progress.  

With Russia having entered the Syrian civil war more forcefully, the risk of wider conflict in the region is much higher.  We aren't surprised by their moves as they were widely telegraphed by President Putin.  However, Russia is the one country with the power, economic incentive and guts to raise the price of oil by creating unrest.  Under the current administrations, the US and its allies have prioritized diplomacy over military action but it is unclear to us if this reduces risks or creates a vacuum into which bad actors like ISIS can grow their power.  

Regardless, we view the uncertainty in that part of the world as a rising risk to the global economy, more so than other popular concerns like the slowdown in China.  While we are talking about risks, there are two in Europe that deserve mention.  First is the growing tide of refugees streaming into southern and central Europe.  We expect that this will continue to grow for some time, taxing both the resources and political agenda of an already weak Eurozone.  Second, and perhaps more troubling, is the Volkswagen emissions fiasco.  This situation has the makings of Europe’s Enron/Worldcom moment and we could see it harming Germany’s export- driven economy and spawning a new wave of regulation.

China continues along on its bumpy descent toward a more sustainable growth rate, driven by a service-oriented economy.  The authorities badly handled the A share market run up (cheering too loudly) and subsequent crash (several ham-handed interventions intended to stop the selling), destroying some of their reformist credibility.  They are learning as they go, however, and market reforms in the currency, bond and equity markets will continue at a slower pace.  

Prime Minister Abe of Japan announced Abenomics 2.0 to little fanfare, as his new “arrows” added little of substance to the original three arrows.  Much reform has been accomplished in the corporate sector and a greater emphasis on reforming work rules and growing the work force will continue to help the Japanese economy increase its potential growth rate. The recently agreed Trans-Pacific Partnership should also help boost Japan’s export sector.  However, big challenges remain, including the inability to grow the work force over the long term without immigration, and recent data show mixed results for Abe’s aggressive agenda.  

With risks rising outside the US, we cut back our international stock exposure somewhat in favor of an increase in hedge fund strategies.  So we are now overweight in a broad group of hedged strategies, underweight in US small cap and underweight in fixed income.  We have maintained a neutral approach on US large cap as we believe this area of the market will continue to serve as a safe haven for equity investors.  

 October 9, 2015                  © Essential Investment Partners, LLC                    All Rights Reserved


Thoughts on the Closed End Fund Market

We have been investing in closed end funds for our clients for more than a decade.  Over that time, we have developed an extensive knowledge of the unique nature of that market and the intricacies of how closed end funds operate for investors.  Since March of 2009, we have applied this knowledge in managing the Essential Absolute Return strategy with excellent results until the last twelve months.  

In the early days of this strategy, we invested primarily in corporate action situations that were low risk and which provided relatively steady and predictable returns.  Many of those corporate actions were a direct fallout of the 2008 financial crisis.  As the effects of that crisis faded, so did the number of opportunities of this type.  

More recently, we have focused on convergence trading.  We believe the closed end fund market is structurally inefficient which gives rise to temporary mis-pricing of assets, relative to their “normal” value.  We try to buy mis-priced funds, and then wait for the pricing to return to average or normal levels.  These types of opportunities tend to give rise to more volatile return streams (both positive and negative) and, because we never know when markets will return to normal pricing, the timing of such returns is uncertain.  However, because of the leverage inherent in most fixed income-oriented closed end funds, our clients earn a high current income stream which serves to mitigate somewhat the risk of price declines.  

Over the past twelve months, closed end fund discounts have widened to levels not seen since the financial crisis of 2008.  Yet, there has been no crisis, no significant widening of spreads (except in a few emerging markets where we have limited exposure), and no dramatic changes in the levels of short or long term interest rates.  There have, however, been periods of market uncertainty caused by concerns about the US Federal Reserve raising interest rates, a potential Greek default or exit from the Eurozone and China’s boom and bust A share market.  These events had relatively little impact on our holdings’ underlying net asset values.  Yet discounts continue to widen.  

This time period has left us wondering if something has fundamentally changed in the closed end fund market.  There have been a few developments: (1) the market for new closed end funds is quite muted and new funds that are being brought to market have more innovative structures designed to limit discounts; (2) the number of institutional investors has grown to the point where pure corporate action arbitrage opportunities are now rare; (3) fixed income exchange traded funds continue to gain popularity, potentially distracting investor interest away from closed end funds; and (4) investors have been hearing for years that the end of bond bull market is upon us and they need to prepare for rapidly rising rates.  

The first two factors should actually bring more rational pricing to the closed end fund market, not less.  The last two factors may actually be depressing the demand for closed end funds among retail investors, making a return to rational pricing more difficult.  We believe the fourth factor — fear about the impact of rising rates — is likely the biggest contributor.  For many reasons, we believe this fear is overblown.  

Over the course of the past year, we have continued to selectively add to positions in closed end funds that meet our investment criteria, only to see discounts on these funds widen further.  And we have allocated additional client (and personal) assets to this strategy, believing that the opportunities now present are extraordinary.  We hear the same story from our fellow institutional investors in closed end funds.  Here is a chart recently published by RiverNorth, a well-known manager in the closed end fund space.  

Taxable Bond Funds: 30-day Moving Average Discount June.1997-June.2015

 Source: Morningstar, Inc. 

Source: Morningstar, Inc. 

As you can see, discounts have only been at this level immediately prior to the last two recessions.  In 2000, discounts quickly recovered, even before the recession fully kicked in.  In 2008, the financial crisis wreaked temporary havoc with all financial assets before a strong recovery kicked in.  We believe this time period is more likely to be like the early 2000s but there is of course no assurance that it will turn out that way.  

We are exercising patience in waiting for prices to return to more normal levels with the comfort of knowing that we are able to buy the assets of closed end funds at 10-15% discounts off the prices available directly or through open end mutual funds or exchange traded funds. 

July 30, 2015                                            Essential Investment Partners, LLC

Thoughts on the Current Outlook -- July, 2015

Three Key Thoughts:

  1. Fed dials back its optimism about US economy; 2+% is the new norm

  2. China's stock market volatility complicates market reformers' job

  3. Greece is the word 

Last quarter, we talked about our expectation that the US economy would grow in the 2-2.5% range for 2015, a result very similar to the previous three years.  Now that we have seen much more data on the first quarter and some preliminary figures for the second quarter, the Federal Reserve has dialed its consensus forecasts down into this range as well.  And the discussions about interest rate hikes are more about the Fed wanting to get off of zero so that it has room to maneuver if the economy weakens.  This is a very different viewpoint than one which had been concerned about strong growth and inflation. 

You might wonder why we spend any time thinking about the aggregate growth of the US economy.  After all, gyrations in that growth rate show very little correlation to stock market returns.  We care because stock prices are tied quite closely to corporate earnings and aggregate corporate earnings growth is tied to the nominal growth (not adjusted for inflation) in the economy.  Stock prices can rise for either of two reasons: (1) growth in corporate earnings; or (2) an expansion in the multiple (the price/earnings ratio) that investors are willing to pay for future earnings.  At this point in the market cycle, those multiples have already expanded significantly so further gains are very dependent on earnings growth.

There are other underlying reasons why we expect the economy to grow slowly over the next several years.  In aggregate, the economy can only produce more by a combination of  increases in the labor force and increases in productivity.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that the US labor force will grow by about 0.5% over the next 7 years.  With the exception of a short period in the early 2000s, productivity has increased about 1.5% annually over the long term.  Adding these together, we get about 2% real (after inflation) growth as the new benchmark.  If we add 2% inflation, then we can expect about 4% in corporate profit growth, certainly not a very exciting number.  

With the US stock market trading at a price/earnings ratio of about 17, investors are paying a relatively high price for pretty slow growth.  So what is a good corporate executive to do?  Predictably, corporations have been raising dividends and buying back stock.  While stock buybacks boost reported earnings per share (because the share count is lower), they do nothing to grow the underlying business.  Bottom line: we expect modest returns on US stocks.

Outside the US, we are more optimistic about stocks as earnings growth is picking up in many places and prices are much more reasonable.  However, the major non US economies all have their issues.  

In China, financial regulators are getting a lesson in what can go wrong when markets are opened up without all of the proper regulatory controls in place.  The China A share market soared for more than a year and now is suffering a severe correction.  Day to day volatility is through the roof and regulators are scrambling to put in place proper margin account controls and other initiatives to stabilize the markets.  Ironically, this stock market volatility was caused by the rush of domestic investors speculating on A shares, betting that prices would go higher once non US investors are fully allowed in.  This game was bound to end poorly and it is a distraction from the government’s long term efforts to open China’s capital markets to the outside world.  We view these developments as growing pains and, as in the past, China will learn, adapt and move forward. 

Japan continues to make progress, albeit slowly, in creating sustainable economic growth and a moderate level of inflation.  If we look at Japan with the same lens we examined US growth potential above, it is easy to see how difficult their challenge is.  Japan’s demographics are poor (rapidly aging and low birth rate) and they do not encourage immigration so their labor force is not growing.  Addressing these issues is one part of Prime Minister Abe’s “third arrow” of comprehensive labor and corporate governance reforms.  

In Europe, Greece is the word, for now anyway.  Having stolen the limelight from the rest of Europe (which seemed on the road to a respectable recovery), Greece now seems to be playing the part of your erratic drunk uncle at the family party.  His behavior gets increasingly bizarre up to the point at which he is ushered out the door by the largest family members.  It seems to us that the only reasons the Europeans continue to negotiate are: (1) to prevent other weak members (Portugal, Spain, Italy and France) from trying to renegotiate their own debts; and (2) to prevent Greece from leaving the Eurozone and providing an opening for a competing rescue with geopolitical implications (think Russia).  If the Europeans could dispatch Greece in isolation, they would have long since done so.  It is just not that simple and the entire episode raises questions about the wisdom of the currency union for weaker members.  So we must be mindful of the broader risks and how they are managed.  

In client portfolios, we remain overweight stocks in a diversified set of strategies, including a high allocation to international stock markets where growth is emerging.   In addition, we are under-weighted in fixed income as yields generally are not attractive except in closed end funds where discounts to net asset value have widened to very attractive levels.  We continue to add to carefully selected hedged strategies as a way of controlling portfolio risk.  

July 8, 2015                   © Essential Investment Partners, LLC               All Rights Reserved

Social Security -- The Perplexing Retirement Asset

With thousands of baby boomers reaching retirement age each day, tens of millions of people will be signing up to receive their Social Security benefits over the coming few years.  Until President Reagan worked out a deal with Congress to raise the retirement age gradually, many of us expected that Social Security would be bankrupt long before we reached retirement age.  The good news is that the system is solvent for at least another decade but it will need another, perhaps similar, fix to keep full benefits going through retirement for boomers and gen Xers.

What many don't know, however, is that maximizing your Social Security benefits takes some planning.  Most know that delaying benefits until age 66 (so called Full Retirement Age for most boomers) is good and delaying until age 70 is even better.  While that is generally true, the situation can get quite complex and confusing for two earner couples, divorced individuals, couples with substantial age differences and even those couples who have uneven employment records.  

As more of our clients are approaching their full retirement age, we decided to dig deeper into this subject and, quite honestly, we were surprised by what we found.  While the simple rules of thumb do apply, they may not maximize benefits, depending on the specific situation.  And, not surprisingly, the helpful folks at the Social Security Administration may not be able to provide you the best answers.  Perhaps more importantly, they likely won't know if you are asking the wrong questions for your situation.  

In addition to lots of reading on this topic, we have purchased software that allows us to help clients determine the optimal claiming strategy for their specific situations.  You might think: how much difference can this make?  The answer is: quite a lot. For example, one change to the simple "defer until 70" strategy for a two career couple could net them an incremental $50k in benefits!

This is the type of service we provide to our wealth management clients as part of helping them live the best life possible with the resources they have available.  


A few thoughts about mutual fund share classes

The US Supreme Court weighed in Monday of this week on an arcane area of the mutual fund world: whether 401(k) plan sponsors have a continuing obligation to search for the lowest cost share class options for their participants.  Leaving aside the details of that case, investors might be wondering whether similar logic might be applied to mutual funds selected by their investment advisers.  

Here at Essential Investment Partners, we are fiduciaries for our clients so we are required to put their best interests first, always. In the context of selecting share classes, that means we pick the share class we believe makes the most economic sense for our clients.  

The math involved is usually pretty straightforward.  Typically (though not always), the difference in the annual cost of a fund's "investor" class and its "institutional" share class is 0.25%.  On the flip side, our clients typically pay a $25 fee to buy an institutional share class and there is no upfront fee to buy the investor class.  So the question is: what is the breakeven point?  If we assume a one year holding period, the answer is $10,000 (10,000 X 0.25% = $25).

This is the rule of thumb we use in selecting share classes for client portfolios.  If the purchase is for more than $10,000 and we expect to hold the fund for at least a year, then we buy the institutional share class, if it is available.  (Not all fund companies offer institutional share classes and some that do have very high minimums that our clients might not be able to meet.)

This is just one of the elements we consider when making investment decisions for our clients.  And, there may well be circumstances when an approach other than our rule of thumb for share class choice is appropriate.

Back to the US Supreme Court case for a moment.  This is likely to turn into an "inside baseball" case before it is done because of the complexity of how fees are shared in 401(k) plans.  That is a subject for another day.  However, we are happy that the Court took up a case that is likely to shed light on the importance of the costs of retirement investing.  And, most importantly, how we should be putting plan participants' long term interests first.  


Thoughts on the Current Outlook -- April, 2015

The US economy grew by 2.3% in 2012, 2.2% in 2013 and 2.4% in 2014, despite a number of volatile quarterly reports.  We expect a similar result in 2015.  In fact, 2015 is shaping up in some ways very much like 2014: an unexpectedly poor first quarter, resulting from temporary factors, followed by a bounce back to somewhat stronger growth.  The net result is slow but surprisingly consistent growth.  

This time, the special factors have been the east coast weather (again!), the west coast port labor dispute and a sharp reduction in energy projects.  In the last few weeks, we have seen expectations for first quarter growth get marked down quickly. Optimism for a second half rebound remains high, however.  

The Federal Reserve seems to have become cheerleader-in-chief for the economy.   Perhaps it isn’t too surprising that they would “talk their book,” hoping their optimism becomes contagious, allowing a move off of zero interest rates.  Unfortunately, their track record in the last several years is consistent: too much optimism, which must be tempered significantly as reality sets in.  Bond investors now believe the Fed will be slower to raise rates than the Fed members themselves believe.  We agree.  

While the economy will likely do better later this year, three factors will likely keep inflation low and growth slow:  (1) the large decline in oil prices will keep headline inflation low and producer prices stable, offsetting modest wage pressures; (2) gains in the value of the dollar relative to almost all other major currencies make imports cheaper and exports more expensive, leading to lower domestic growth; (3) reduced capital expenditures and losses in high paying employment in the energy sector will be reflected in economic reports over the balance of 2015.  Over the longer term, we believe that very slow growth in the labor force, combined with small productivity gains, will constrain our growth to less than 3%.  

Over the next few weeks, we will get another read on the magnitude of the impact of the stronger dollar and lower oil prices on corporate earnings.  In aggregate, earnings are likely to decline modestly.  For now, investors are giving companies a pass on the earnings hit from the stronger dollar and are expecting that oil prices will gradually recover.  And so far, consumers haven’t been spending their oil bonuses – they have been saving them instead.  Put all these factors together and US stock valuations remain disturbingly high, relative to earnings.  

Despite all of this talk about slow US growth, we are still doing much better than Europe and Japan.  Looking back, the dollar strength compared to the Euro and the Yen makes perfect sense.  Higher rates, stronger growth, low inflation: what’s not to like?  The question is: where do we head from here?  We believe that as the European and Japanese economies recover, the gap between the respective growth rates will decline and the currencies will be more stable.  However, fixed income investors will continue to be drawn to US bonds as our rates are still more attractive than those available in Europe and Japan.  We expect this will keep a lid on US longer term rates and the dollar in a positive trend.  

Europe finally seems to be turning a corner, even while dealing with the Greek challenge and uncertainty in Ukraine.  With the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing program well underway, we expect interest rates there to stay low until the major economies show sustained growth and some inflation is evident.  These green shoots have been welcomed by the equity markets, which have rallied sharply.  Unfortunately for US dollar investors, a portion of those gains have been erased by currency losses.  

In Japan, the third arrow of Abenomics – important economic and labor reforms – are beginning to take hold.  Corporate governance reform, increased equity investments by pension plans, greater employer/employee flexibility and growing wages are a few of the more visible signs that genuine change is afoot.  Serious problems remain, however, including a very rapidly aging workforce, an aversion to immigration and low productivity growth, all of which work to limit the potential growth of the Japanese economy.  

Finally, China continues on its unique path toward greater free market reform, broader social safety nets and crackdowns on political dissent and “corruption.”  In the west, we have a hard time understanding how capitalism can flourish in the absence of political and personal freedom.  Meanwhile, given the miraculous growth of the Chinese economy over the last 30 years, the Chinese wonder why we don’t think their model is better than ours!  

We expect China to continue its move toward a sustainable 4-5% growth rate, suitable for a mature but healthy economy.  And they have accelerated the pace of capital market reforms, including a more freely traded currency, more flexible exchange rate and relaxed constraints on trading in the domestic equity (A share) and Hong Kong equity markets.  Longer term, this greater economic openness is quite positive for the entire region.

In client portfolios, we remain overweight stocks in a diversified set of strategies, including a high allocation to international stock markets where growth is emerging.   In addition, we are under-weighted in fixed income as yields generally are not attractive.  We continue to add to carefully selected hedged strategies as we believe valuations of US stocks and bonds are high. 

April 15, 2015

© Essential Investment Partners, LLC               All Rights Reserved


2015 Investment Outlook

And everyone thought the Fed would be the main story in 2014…

In mid-2013, the Federal Reserve sent ripples across world financial markets when it hinted that it would begin “tapering” its bond purchase program soon.  As it turns out, the Fed did wind down its bond buying program over the course of 2014 with virtually no apparent impact on the markets.  Why no impact?  The Fed’s buying was readily replaced by other investors, looking to put money to work in a strong currency at higher yields than most other high quality sovereign debt.  In fact, despite the Fed’s withdrawal from the bond market, yields on long term US government debt marched steadily lower over the course of 2014. 

This leads to two related questions: why is the dollar so strong and why are competing yields so low?  The US economy is now the leading growth engine among developed economies.  With growth at roughly 3% annually, the US economy is running circles around Japan and Europe, both of which face serious economic issues.  So, against these two other major currencies, the dollar should be strong.  

Japan is trying to boost itself out of a two decade malaise with its Abenomics agenda.  However, a sales tax hike, enacted effective April 1 of last year to try to keep the program on a balanced fiscal footing, slowed the economy much more than anticipated.  Prime Minister Abe decided to call elections in order to reaffirm support for his three arrow program.  As we have said previously, the third arrow – genuine reform in labor markets and related policies – will be exceptionally difficult to execute but they are critical to the success of the program.  

Europe, meanwhile, seems destined to take up the mantle of the world’s chief bureaucrat – all talk and no action.  Nearly two years after ECB chief Mario Draghi promised “whatever it takes” to stimulate the economy, they are still in the same spot:  no growth, no inflation and no stimulus.  The question now is which route do they take next:  backsliding into recession, renewed break up talk as peripheral countries tire of austerity or actual monetary stimulus designed to reignite growth.  The only progress Draghi has made so far is weakening the Euro, which will help Germany, Europe’s biggest exporter. 

…but oil pushes itself onto the main stage…

Behind all of the cheering about America nearing energy self-sufficiency, there was a subplot building that few foresaw in its scale: the impending collision of expanding supply and flat demand.  While not wildly out of whack, excess global supply was enough to bring about a sudden and rapid decline in crude prices.  Then, in late November, OPEC added more downward pressure by deciding to maintain production at its current level.  There is much speculation about their motivation – to maintain market share, to wipe out recent higher cost-based producers, to keep income up for their weaker countries are among the possibilities – but whatever the correct answer is, the world now has excess oil.  And the price has been in free fall.  

First order winners and losers in this period of much lower oil prices are easy to spot.  Consumers in oil-importing countries (US, China, Japan and Europe principally) now have more income at their disposal than previously.  Meanwhile, the big oil exporting countries (OPEC, Russia, Norway, Canada) will see significant declines in oil revenue as fixed price contracts mature and spot prices take over.  

For world financial markets, the cross currents are many.  An even stronger dollar reverberates through emerging market economies somewhat indiscriminately, knocking down debt and equity values.  Inflation, already considered too low in many developed countries, will now be even lower.  Capital spending plans for energy projects are put on hold, along with the employment growth that came with those projects.  And high yield debt comes under fire because so much was issued to newer, less financially strong energy companies.  

…and the ending to this story has yet to be written…

Where oil prices may go from here in the short term is anyone’s guess.  Longer term, we expect the supply/demand imbalance to be resolved in favor of prices significantly higher than the current market (around $50/barrel at this writing).  However, more important are the implications of low oil prices in the near term.  We believe these are:

  • Higher financial market volatility as oil prices fluctuate and winners and losers are sorted out 
  • A boost to consumers in oil importing countries in the form of direct cash benefits in those countries with significant automobile use and in the form of stable or lower prices for transported goods and services for those without as much automobile use
  • Short and medium term interest rates are likely to stay lower for longer than previously expected as reported inflation drops precipitously.  For the US, we expect the Fed to stay on hold and stimulus programs in Japan to continue and to get started in earnest in Europe
  • More potential geopolitical instability as oil exporting countries assess the impact of lower oil prices on their domestic economies and decide whether and how to act in their own best interests.  Russia seems like the biggest wild card, having recently shown little regard for others’ interests in Ukraine and routinely threatened supply disruptions for political gain
  • Second order effects such as high yield bond defaults, employment cutbacks in energy and  retrenchment in capital spending plans will begin to take hold over the course of 2015 if prices stay at current levels

…but in the near term, we should use volatility to our advantage.

Here in the US, we believe the net short term effects will be positive as the benefit to consumers far outweighs the damage done to the energy sector of the economy.  And, this stronger growth should come with little or no inflation.  However, if oil prices stay low for long, we will begin to see the negative impacts on employment and capital spending.  Outside the US, the effects will be highly variable, even among oil importing countries.  

In client portfolios, we remain overweight stocks in a diversified set of strategies, including a high allocation to international markets where valuations are much more reasonable.  Internationally, we believe active managers can use the recent volatility to their investors’ advantage.   We continue to be underweight in fixed income as the yields available do not compensate investors adequately for the risks assumed.    

January 14, 2015
© Essential Investment Partners, LLC               All Rights Reserved


Thoughts on the Current Outlook -- October, 2014

A few comments about risk…

At a point in time when many people think US stocks are very overvalued and even more believe that bond prices are in a bubble, we thought it made sense to talk a bit about risks we see.  But first a little background.  Howard Marks, Chairman of Oaktree, a highly-regarded investment firm, has written eloquently and extensively on the subject of risk.  He sets the stage this way:  “Here’s the essential conundrum: investing requires us to decide how to position a portfolio for future developments, but the future isn’t knowable.”

But even though we can’t know the future, we can still develop a plan to deal with possible outcomes in a logical way.  Indeed, we, like most investors, view the investing world as a series of possible outcomes each with its own probability of occurring.  Because each outcome only has a probability, we have no way of knowing in advance what will actually occur.  Back to Mr. Marks: “Risk means more things can happen than will happen…Many things would have happened in each case in the past, and the fact that only one did understates the variability that existed…Even though many things can happen, only one will.”

Rather than trying to predict the exact course of events, it is our job to try to tip the scales in our favor, i.e., make informed judgments about investments that are likely to succeed based on the events we believe are most likely to occur. Of course, we will almost always be wrong about the specific events (unless we are just lucky) but if we correctly choose those investments with more upside than downside, we and our clients should fare well over time.  Mr. Marks refers to this process as finding “asymmetries” – where the upside far exceeds the downside.  

Are bonds now riskier than stocks?

Applying this thinking to the current environment, we can readily see good and bad asymmetries in the bond world.  The very low yields on sovereign debt throughout the developed world can’t fall much further but those rates could certainly rise dramatically, if growth and inflation were to be ignited.  This is particularly true in continental Europe and Japan where we believe the downside risk to bond prices is much greater than the upside – the bad kind of asymmetry. 

Further amplifying this risk, the Japanese and European central banks are firmly in stimulus mode.  Japan is much further along and the jury is still out on whether they will be able to jumpstart the economy.  So far they have succeeded in weakening the yen dramatically and spurring sporadic growth.  While a weaker yen might boost reported inflation, it could be counterproductive if rising import prices dampen economic growth.  In Europe, the central bank is just beginning its quantitative easing program and the only result so far is a significant drop in the common currency.  Due to limitations unique to the Eurozone situation, this program will have a tougher time succeeding.  In addition, it has a big near term challenge in overcoming the negative effects of the sanctions against Russia on the Eurozone economy.  Bottom line, both central banks are working hard to boost their economies and, if they are successful, rates will rise significantly.  For these economies, we believe the answer is yes, bonds are much riskier than stocks.  

Here in the US, the Federal Reserve is near the end of its bond purchase program and will likely begin raising short term rates sometime next year.  Unless we get some spark of inflation, however, we expect those rate increases to be relatively modest.  With energy prices recently declining and wage pressures non-existent, reported inflation is likely to be benign. So we think a large increase in US rates is unlikely but a modestly higher range of rates, particularly for short and medium term debt, seems like a quite reasonable outcome.  However, we can buy fixed income closed end funds at very high discounts to net asset values (reflecting investors’ belief that a large increase in rates or spreads is around the corner) which we believe provides our clients a good asymmetry.  In addition, high yield and floating rate loans provide good yields relative to inflation and higher quality bonds.  For the US market, we don’t think carefully selected bond investments are riskier than stocks.  

Stocks aren’t cheap either

Among US stocks, we have thought small caps were overvalued for a long time.  We were wrong in 2013 but have been proven correct so far in 2014 as small caps have drastically underperformed large caps.  However, even among large cap companies, we are finding it difficult to find high quality companies trading at reasonable values.  One particular concern of ours is that many very good, but slow-growing, companies are trading at very high multiples on earnings.  Typically, these stocks would be safe havens in difficult markets – that may not prove to be true if the market decides to mark these multiples down to more reasonable levels.  

To some extent, stocks are levitating based on a lack of alternatives (many perceive a higher risk in bonds) and a general skepticism that the bull market cannot last much longer.  How long this will go on and how it will be resolved only time will tell.  For now, we are paying very close attention to individual stock values, relative to the earnings growth expected.   

Outside the US, valuations are much less challenged so we added significantly to international stock fund positions earlier this year.  This proved premature this quarter as the dollar strengthened dramatically and international stocks, with the exception of a few markets, slumped.  However, leaving China aside, prospects for better economic growth are good in the coming year and this should provide a positive environment for stocks.  

In China, the gradual growth slowdown continues, making it hard for investors to handicap the stock market.  As a result, valuations remain low.  We believe China is heading for mid-single digit GDP growth with a greater share of its economy comprised of consumer spending.  What we find hard to discern is how the dichotomy between the government’s more market-oriented economic policies and crack down on political freedoms will play out.  

Finally, we continue to increase positions in hedged investments which provide some exposure to equity and debt markets but with lower market exposure.  Fortunately, more successful hedge fund managers are bringing their strategies to mutual fund form, providing us access to a much broader array of managers and strategies than ever before.

October 8, 2014                   

© Essential Investment Partners, LLC          All Rights Reserved